Implementing Gun Bill Could Cost Up To $25M A Year

The #1 community for Gun Owners of the Gulf Coast States

Member Benefits:

  • Fewer Ads!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • bac3996

    Marksman
    Joined
    Oct 21, 2012
    Messages
    839
    Points
    28
    Location
    Pensacola ,Florida
    Implementing Gun Bill Could Cost Up To $25M A Year

    by Hugh McQuaid | Apr 4, 2013 7:30am




    The legislature’s bipartisan response to the Newtown shooting could cost the state up to $25 million a year in additional prison costs based on increased penalties for certain crimes, according to the Office of Fiscal Analysis. The bill adds mandatory minimum sentences to some crimes, increases penalties for several firearm-related offenses — including gun trafficking and illegal possession of a weapon — and reclassifies some offenses as felonies.
    “To the extent that sentence lengths increase based on changes in the bill, due to increases in classification of crimes, the DOC would incur costs due to increased prison population because of longer sentences,” the bill’s fiscal note reads.
    While the fiscal office estimates the department’s increased costs could reach $25.3 million a year, it notes that the actual costs will depend on how much courts increase the sentences, which may not be clear until 2017.
    The Department of Emergency Services and Public Protection is expected to incur costs between $500,000 and $1.5 million next fiscal year for the creation of the gun offender registry depending on its structure and operational requirements. Additionally, it will cost about $250,000 annually to operate the database.
    The bill will cost the state money in other areas as well. According to OFA, the legislation will cost the state between $16 and $17 million through the end of Fiscal Year 2015.
    Between $3 million and $4 million of the additional costs will be incurred by the Department of Emergency Services and Public Protection for security audits, more background checks and permit requirements, and costs associated with creating and maintaining a gun offender registry.
    It will also cost the Department of Mental Health and Addiction Services around $8.6 million for expanded services and the development of a mental health admission database.
    The Department of Children and Families will incur a cost of $1.8 million to establish behavioral health programs for children.
    According to the fiscal note, the bill also authorizes $15 million in General Obligation Bonds that will cost the state $22.9 million in debt service.


    http://www.ctnewsjunkie.com/ctnj.ph...menting_gun_bill_could_cost_up_to_25m_a_year/
     

    Bay Ranger

    Master
    Joined
    Oct 1, 2012
    Messages
    1,919
    Points
    113
    Location
    Gulf Breeze (improper)
    Hmmmmm, increased costs to the state. I've got the perfect solution: put a hefty tax on anything gun related. Solves two problems with one move: 1) generates more revenue; and 2) make it so expensive to own or use a gun that after awhile you effectively take guns away from nearly everyone. What's the saying? Crazy as a fox?
     

    TURTLE

    Marksman
    Joined
    Sep 27, 2012
    Messages
    876
    Points
    16
    Location
    Tiger Point
    To institute a true universal background check you would not have to have a registry but that is exactly what they are going for. I just hope that most pro gun politicians shoot that down and demand them come up with a constitutional way or none at all . Requireing registration is Unconstitutional as it gets so that should be off the table aready. If all they do is close "loopholes" at gun shows and online thats fine cause there are no "Loopholes" , and we all know it so let those idiots think they won with that.
     

    flyandscuba

    Master
    Joined
    Sep 26, 2012
    Messages
    3,112
    Points
    38
    Location
    Anchorage, AK / Milton, FL
    The bi-partisan "compromise" background check bill is supposed to require background checks at gun shows and for internet sales -- but yet "private" sales are supposed to be untouched... Uh, the sales I do at gunshows and on the internet ARE private sales! WTF?!?! Do these elected idiots even know what the hell they are doing? Well, I already knew the answer to that!

    If they are saying "commercial" sales at gun shows and through the internet will now require a background check -- I've got a news flash for them... They already require a background check -- because commercial sales require a dealer's license and transfers are done through an FFL. Geesh!

    Maybe this is a tactical maneuver -- to craft a gutless law that does absolutely NOTHING -- just to make the Libs think that a loophole has been closed??
     

    CCHGN

    Banned
    Joined
    Feb 9, 2013
    Messages
    1,791
    Points
    0
    Location
    East Milton
    Was watching the Senate today( CSpan)...good points made. No matter what laws are passed, criminals will get around them. They only effect law abiding citizens...BG checks>straw purchases and no law will prevent stealing guns, which 99% of guns used in crimes are stolen. Columbine was straw purchases, Virg. Tech and Aurora and AZ( Gabby)- guns were purchased legally, with BG checks.

    Senator from Connecticut said Lanza breached the door to get in..had the nerve to say that alot of lives would have been saved if Lanza had 10rnd mags instead of 30.......heck with that, sue the school for not making it more secure. They can put up more, higher fences and more cameras( with security guards watching them and take him out before he reached the door) and make doors bullet proof.
     

    Ben Ghazi

    Marksman
    Joined
    Sep 27, 2012
    Messages
    818
    Points
    43
    schools could have metal detectors that automatically lock the 2nd door if you go through the first door with a metal object requiring inspection before entry is allowed.
    anyone authorised to have a weapon could have a card or better yet a Biometric Access Door Lock to allow entry.
    I have used one of these for over 10 years


    http://www.zorotools.com/g/00064368/k-G1490221?utm_source=google_shopping&utm_medium=cpc&utm_campaign=Google_Shopping_Feed&kw={keyword}&gclid=CKuvxf6nwbYCFQjOnAodyC0ABA
     
    Top Bottom