Less than 60 days to a major election and no panic buying. I'm Surprised!

[Carl]

The best way to take control over a people and control them utterly is to take a little of their freedom at a time, to erode their rights by a thousand tiny and almost imperceptible reductions. In this way the people will not see those rights and freedoms being removed until past the point at which those changes can be reversed.

The most foolish mistake we could possibly make would be to allow the subjugated races to possess arms. History shows that all conquerors who have allowed their subjugated races to carry arms have prepared their own downfall by so doing. Indeed, I would go so far as to say that the supply of arms to the underdogs is a sine qua non for the overthrow of any sovereignty. So let's not have any native militia or native police.

:Adolf Hitler

Where did you get this quote from? Hogans Heroes?

 

[PensacolaOperator]

Maybe so. I do have a lot of liberal friends and that might skew my perception. I live in Leon County, which is one of two blue counties in the panhandle.

Don't forget Dade and Broward

 

[Rebel_Rider1969]

Don't forget about the dangling chads...
Not the first ramrod job.

 

[PensacolaOperator]

This is probably one of the BEST threads ever on this forum. Extremely knowledgeable and informative on current events. Great morning read over coffee.

 

[Miami_JBT]

m4a1sof and Miami_JBT,

You both seem to think the elections weren’t rigged in 2020, but the reasons you use to continue justifying that stance are indicative of exactly why “only” Trump was cheated in 2020. The unknown puppet-masters can’t tip their hand so blatantly all at once. Otherwise, too many unanswerable questions.

They screwed Trump (and the Nation) in 2020. They did it again in 2022. I fully expect it to happen again in a few weeks.

Biden was a recluse for most of his “campaign”, and he let the media run his marketing campaign. Add the subtle “razor thin” strategic cheating, and his “win” was close enough to seem plausible. If you believed it was election fraud, you were/are a conspiracy theorist.

The kackling IDIOT was installed as the Dem candidate without a SINGLE PRIMARY VOTE (EVER), and she was ALSO a recluse for much of her campaign until very recently, and she is showing exactly why her handlers don’t want her going off-script or without a teleprompter.

Why wouldn’t anyone expect the same “razor thin” strategic cheating again? Especially now with tens of MILLIONS of illegal invaders to add plausible doubt of accuracy into the voter fraud discussions.

So far, the rightful POTUS is currently forced to win a third election to take office for his second term, and he has already survived TWO assassination attempts along the way (not counting the ONLSAUGHT of federal and state law-fare).

If that idiot and her coward running mate ACTUALLY earn the most electoral college votes Without cheating, then this Nation is overrun by incompetent FOOLS. If they steal the necessary votes (AGAIN), then the system is irreparably broken and needs a dramatic overhaul of righteous accountability and transparency.

If Trump doesn’t survive to the election, or (if he somehow is allowed to win) through his entire term, then there will be an historic upheaval.

Bottom line: if Trump doesn’t win AND survive his full term, a Founding Fathers moment will be needed to course-correct this Nation’s trajectory.

As for the OP topic, people are either stocked up already, broke, both, or drinking the libtard koolaid and don’t worry about it.

You mean why am I looking at this as an investigator and seeing that the evidence doesn't match the accusations? Because that's how reality works. Again, why are members of Trump's legal team pleading guilty? Why are they admitting under oath that they lied about their claims of having evidence of fraud, when no such evidence actually existed?

Additionally, you do understand that the primary isn't binding right? You do know that both the RNC and DNC are private organizations and they can choose their candidates however they see fit, right?

Heck, the modern primary system only came about in the 1970s because of the McGovern–Fraser Commission, which was a private commission held by the DNC after the 1968 primary in which LBJ was so much of a screw up, the party booted him from nomination even though the party wanted him, but the masses of Democrat voters didn't. The commission was formed to figure out a way to simple avoid such a situation. So the current primary system was formed and the RNC decided to copy it.

Party delegates vote for the candidate to be nominated at the Party Convention. Actual party members vote. The primary the general public votes in isn't binding. It is a publicity race just to see who's more popular amongst the masses. But even then, not all states have primaries and not all states have closed primaries.

Meaning that registered Democrat voters can vote in Republican primaries and vice versa.

Anyways, the DNC and the RNC both have "unpledged/super" delegates (people who actually vote for the candidate being nominated) and those delegates aren't directly voted on by the public to be delegates. They're appointed by the party. The majority of delegates are former elected officials themselves, major donors, etc. In the RNC, every state/territorial party chair is automatically listed as a delegate. And guess what, the general public doesn't vote for the party chair. Only party committee members vote for the party chair and the party committee members are voted by the registered party members at the county level RECs.