The New Classified Ad System is live. Please head here for details: https://gulfcoastgunforum.com/threads/new-classified-ad-system-tutorial.112735/
Someone mentioned earlier that a drug/alcohol test should have been taken to either eliminated that possibility or revealed an explanation. Is it so beyond the realm of possibilities that actors might indulge a habit while they practice their craft?He's head of the chain of command, and the shooter, so he should be relieved and charged with something... anything... the hell he gets to walk around with just an "I'm sorry"
In short a multitude of safe firearms practices recommend by ALL responsible gun owners and the NRA were not employed. I don't want to hear faux criticism from anti gunners at all when basic common sense measures are not implemented. This tragedy was avoidable.No cameras recording as they were setting up the shot.
This was an accidental discharge (not supposed to be shooting) while they were trying to figure out the shooting angle in a church.
There were supposedly 3 other accidental discharges on set before this.
Anyone on set is allowed to check and see if the gun is safe - anyone.
- I am more inclined to say Negligent Discharge as it is a Single Action Revolver. How do you accidentally pull the hammer back and fire.
The bullet traveled through the girl in the abdomen and hit the guy behind her. She was caught by others (must have been more there).
A single shot was fired.
They had just come back from lunch and the armorer had not recheckeThis tragety the firearms. The assistant director grabbed it, did not check, but told everyone it was a “cold” gun (apparently movie lingo for unloaded/safe to handle).
The main stream media (msm) is controlling the narrative, the language, again. Don't let them do it. A prop gun is inert. It doesn't have the ability to carry out the original intended purpose of a weapon. Maybe made of polymer or plastic, wax, et al. A gun that is able to fire live ammo is a weapon not a prop. The weapon was brandished as if it was a prop. That's why a cinematographer is dead. The capability of the weapon was grossly underestimated.The more I hear about this, the more it sounds like sabotage to me.
What was a live round doing anywhere near the set, let alone finding it’s way into a prop gun.
And the assistant director was an idiot for declaring “cold gun” when he obviously had not checked it.
From what we know now, it's true, dumb but true. You're falling trap to the media narrative. There're not props, there're weapons that shoot real bullets and can kill as evidenced by a dead cinematographer. She had a husband and a 9 year old boy. If you call it something that it is not than the reckless behavior that killed her seems less horrifying.Wow, if that’s true and they really do mix real guns with props, there is no way I would be on that set.
I’m not “falling” for anything.By what we know now, it's true, dumb but true. You're falling trap to the media narrative. There're not props, there're weapons that shoot real bullets and can kill as evidenced by a dead cinematographer. She had a husband and a 9 year old boy. If you call it something that it is not than the reckless behavior that killed her seem less horrifying.
Very good read, Thank You.
^--- Good legal review of how to look at the incident, depending on the facts of the case (which are "strangely difficult" to find out).
+1Very good read, Thank You.
He's head of the chain of command, and the shooter, so he should be relieved and charged with something... anything... the hell he gets to walk around with just an "I'm sorry"
loose rounds and a fanny pack of rounds found mixed at the scene... sloppy .Nevermind the Clinton angle, I'm surprised nobody but reddit is talking about the Illuminate sacrifice angle...View attachment 134874