Hipower
Marksman
WillWork said "+ where do you get the idea that military surplus sales COST the taxpayer?"
What I meant was that the destruction of the ammo mentioned in the first line of the article would have to be done at some expense (ours), not that milsurp sales cost taxpayers. The government sold the ammo cans to dealers, so it shouldn't be too hard to sell some of the ammo they can't track if it's labeled.
Govt: Spend tax dollars to buy the ammo, transport the ammo, store the ammo, use some of the ammo, lose track of the ammo so they don't know its age, etc., then spend money to destroy the ammo, so they can spend more tax dollars to buy new ammo and start the process all over again.
What I meant was that the destruction of the ammo mentioned in the first line of the article would have to be done at some expense (ours), not that milsurp sales cost taxpayers. The government sold the ammo cans to dealers, so it shouldn't be too hard to sell some of the ammo they can't track if it's labeled.
Govt: Spend tax dollars to buy the ammo, transport the ammo, store the ammo, use some of the ammo, lose track of the ammo so they don't know its age, etc., then spend money to destroy the ammo, so they can spend more tax dollars to buy new ammo and start the process all over again.